![]() ![]()
When this strategy is used, history is straight and linear, like it is with the “squash” option, but each individual commit is retained. It emulates running git rebase master on the pull reuqest branch, followed by git merge pr -ff-only on the master branch. Rebase will take each individual commit in the pull request and cherry-pick them onto the master branch. Individual commits are lost, which is best for teams that use “fix up” commits or do not carefully craft individual commits for review before pushing them. Each pull request becomes a single commit in master, and there are no merges, just a simple, straight, linear history. When this strategy is used, history is reminiscent of a centralized version control system. The resulting commit is not a merge commit those individual commits that made up the pull request are discarded. It emulates running git merge pr -squash from the master branch. Squashing will take the tree that’s produced in a merge and creates a single new commit with those repository contents. It gives the most insight into how a branch evolves, but since it preserves every commit is may be very verbose. This strategy is helpful because it illustrates exactly how a developer (or developers) worked on a pull request, including each individual commit along the way. All the individual commits in the pull request branch are preserved as-is, and a new merge commit is created to unite the master branch and the pull request branch. It emulates running git merge pr from the master branch. This is the default integration strategy in Azure Repos, GitHub and most other Git providers. Azure Repos supports each of these scenarios: Merge (no fast-forward) Some people prefer merges, some people prefer rebase, and some people prefer a hybrid approach or even a “squash”. #Rebase on master git codeLike tabs vs spaces, the way code gets integrated is the subject of heated debates on teams. This lets you keep a linear commit history in your master branch, which many people think is an elegant way to visualize history. #Rebase on master git updateArriving in the Sprint 150 update is an option to rebase your pull request into the target branch. But maybe this article will help to dispel your doubts and encourage you to take an approach that works for your team.We’re excited to roll out another way to integrate your pull requests in Azure Repos. The strategy of merge vs rebase is still debatable. I hope some perspectives on Git merge and Git rebase have been provided by this description.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |